Australia firstSentinel-2 mosaic liveOpen-Meteo liveGrid adapter offAnnounced ≠ deliverable

SITE-AU-NSW-BOTANY-QENOS-001

Botany Industrial Park — former Qenos

33.957°S 151.222°EREQUIRES VERIFICATIONModerate confidence
Announced
None
5-year scenario
50–200 MW
Likely energisation
Not dated

Botany Industrial Park — former Qenos

33.957°S 151.222°E

Sentinel-2 cloudless 2024 · pad not a survey

Sydney demand.

Read this pad as

Three desks

Developer

Can I get a pad, a connection, and cooling without waiting a decade?

  • Infrastructure existed for petrochemical load. Connectable spare MW is not verified.
  • Time to power — likely not dated. Remediation and airport/port constraints sit in front of any electrical programme.
  • Bay-adjacent heat rejection is a hypothesis. Zero municipal water remains the conservative default.

Financier

What MW is actually deliverable, and what would break the case?

  • Announced none MW · 5-year scenario 50–200 MW (preliminary).
  • RAP completion.
  • No verified financing for a compute campus on this site.

Mayor / state

What is real on this land, and what would fail in public?

  • Demolition approved. Compute not applied for.
  • Sydney demand.
  • PFAS and chlorinated hydrocarbons are evidenced. Residual risk will shape use and timeline.

Deliverable MW

Announced is not deliverable

Ranges are scenarios with an infrastructure class and a confidence band. They are not a grid offer.

  1. Today

    0 MW

    No DC connection evidenced.

    High confidence

  2. +3y

    Not verified

    Remediation is the near-term programme.

    Unverified

  3. +5y

    50–200 MW

    Sydney capacity is strategically scarce. That does not make this parcel deliverable.

    Preliminary

  4. +10y

    50–250 MW

    Upper bound is a scenario after contamination and airport constraints are resolved.

    Preliminary

  • Sydney compute demand is real. Botany is inside that demand geography.
  • Contamination (CHC, PHC, PFAS, asbestos) is evidenced and is a first-order gate.
  • Sydney Airport OLS, port operations and community process are additional gates.
  • Colliers commentary listed data centre among possible future uses for industrial land in the park. That is a broker comment, not a project.

Why here

  • Sydney demand.
  • Port and subsea geography.
  • Industrial brownfield that is actually turning over.

What is missing

  • RAP completion.
  • Owner compute intent.
  • A grid offer.
  • Airport-compatible envelope.

Time to power

Earliest is not likely

Earliest plausible
2031
Likely

Remediation and airport/port constraints sit in front of any electrical programme.

Energy

Exists ≠ connectable

Infrastructure existed for petrochemical load. Connectable spare MW is not verified.

NEM NSW · Ausgrid / Transgrid (parcel-level NSP not verified)

Workload fit

  • AI inferenceConditionalBest metro-Sydney inference geography in this set, gated by contamination and airport.
  • Cloud / hyperscaleConditionalStrategic Sydney capacity, but parcel scale and constraints are unresolved.
  • Sovereign / defenceConditionalSydney sovereign cloud is a possible use.
  • AI training / HPCFailsTraining-scale MW and community/airport constraints are a poor match.
  • Edge / regionalFitsMetro-edge / port-adjacent.
  • Industrial / mining AIFailsNot a resource basin.

Required for scale

  • 100 MWPreliminary

    Completed RAP, DC planning pathway, and a real Ausgrid/Transgrid offer.

Fibre

Port Botany / Sydney metro. Subsea landings are in the Sydney geography, not on this parcel.

  • Sydney CBD: 5 ms
  • Melbourne: 12 ms
  • Singapore: ms

Thermal / hazards

Temperate coastal Sydney.

Bay-adjacent heat rejection is a hypothesis. Zero municipal water remains the conservative default.

Cyclone: Not a cyclone geography.

Development

landControl
Qenos under administration; ESR/LAOP pathway. Re-verify title before reliance.
planning
Demolition DA approved May 2025 (stages 1–2). Remediation DA in preparation Oct 2025. No compute DA.
environmental
CHC, PHC, PFAS, asbestos evidenced.
approvalStatus
Demolition approved. Compute not applied for.
remediation
Required. RAP-driven.
contamination
CHCs, PHCs, PFAS, asbestos.
tenure
Industrial park, multiple owners.
construction
Demolition commenced/handed over to demolition contractors in 2025 reporting.

Risk

  • environmental

    PFAS and chlorinated hydrocarbons are evidenced. Residual risk will shape use and timeline.

  • planning

    Sydney Airport height and lighting constraints sit over this geography.

  • power

    Sydney metro power is constrained in several catchments. Parcel-level spare MW is unpublished.

Graph

  • botanyINSydney
  • botanyNEARPort Botany
  • botanyCONSTRAINED_BYSydney Airport

Evidence

  • VerifiedExisting

    Qenos entered voluntary administration on 17 April 2024. ESR, through LAOP, proposed a DOCA. Demolition DA for stages 1 and 2 was approved by Bayside Council in May 2025.

    ESR / Botany Industrial Park · Botany Industrial Park community update July 2025 · published 2025-07 · accessed 2026-09-18

  • High confidenceExisting

    Environmental investigations identified chlorinated hydrocarbons, petroleum hydrocarbons, PFAS and asbestos in soils at the former Qenos Botany landholding.

    Botany Industrial Park · Preparing for remediation works at former Qenos landholdings · published 2025-10-21 · accessed 2026-09-18