Australia firstSentinel-2 mosaic liveOpen-Meteo liveGrid adapter offAnnounced ≠ deliverable

SITE-AU-WA-KARRATHA-MAITLAND-001

Karratha / Maitland Strategic Industrial Area

20.800°S 116.640°EREQUIRES VERIFICATIONPreliminary
Announced
None
5-year scenario
50–200 MW
Likely energisation
Not dated

Karratha / Maitland Strategic Industrial Area

20.800°S 116.640°E

Sentinel-2 cloudless 2024 · pad not a survey

Gas and LNG industrial system.

Read this pad as

Three desks

Developer

Can I get a pad, a connection, and cooling without waiting a decade?

  • Energy-rich region. Connectable surplus not shown.
  • Time to power — likely not dated. There is no evidenced programme to hang a likely date on.
  • Heat and water as for the Pilbara generally. Liquid/closed-loop default.

Financier

What MW is actually deliverable, and what would break the case?

  • Announced none MW · 5-year scenario 50–200 MW (preliminary).
  • Almost every verified MW, fibre and water figure.
  • No verified financing for a compute campus on this site.

Mayor / state

What is real on this land, and what would fail in public?

  • No compute project.
  • Gas and LNG industrial system.
  • This object is deliberately thinner than Lansdown, Liddell and Weddell. Depth is the risk.

Deliverable MW

Announced is not deliverable

Ranges are scenarios with an infrastructure class and a confidence band. They are not a grid offer.

  1. Today

    0 MW

    No evidenced compute campus.

    Moderate confidence

  2. +3y

    Not verified

    No project.

    Unverified

  3. +5y

    50–200 MW

    Scenario only, with dedicated generation.

    Preliminary

  4. +10y

    100–400 MW

    Scenario only.

    Preliminary

  • Karratha/Maitland is in the set because of gas, LNG, industrial land and port — the same industrial-energy hypothesis as Boodarie, with less evidenced digital infrastructure than Port Hedland's PH1 + Horizon story.
  • Depth is preliminary on purpose.

Why here

  • Gas and LNG industrial system.
  • Strategic industrial land.
  • Pilbara energy frontier.

What is missing

  • Almost every verified MW, fibre and water figure.
  • A proponent.

Time to power

Earliest is not likely

Earliest plausible
2032
Likely

There is no evidenced programme to hang a likely date on.

Energy

Exists ≠ connectable

Energy-rich region. Connectable surplus not shown.

NWIS / industrial · Horizon Power (confirm)

Workload fit

  • Industrial / mining AIConditionalLNG and industrial users are the plausible demand.
  • AI training / HPCUnknownEnergy exists in the region. Surplus for training is not shown.
  • Edge / regionalConditionalPossible at small MW. Not evidenced.
  • Cloud / hyperscaleFailsNot an AZ geography on current evidence.
  • AI inferenceFailsWrong population geography.
  • Sovereign / defenceUnknownNot evidenced.

Required for scale

  • 100 MWUnverified

    Dedicated generation and water.

Fibre

Weaker evidenced digital story than Port Hedland PH1.

  • Perth: 22 ms
  • Singapore: ms

Thermal / hazards

Hot Pilbara.

Same rule as Hedland: price the penalty; do not veto the geography a priori.

Cyclone: Design-level.

Development

landControl
SIA process. Allocations not fully extracted.
planning
Strategic Industry.
environmental
Industrial estate.
approvalStatus
No compute project.
remediation
Confirm per lot.
contamination
Confirm per lot.
tenure
SIA.
construction
Industrial, not DC.

Risk

  • demand

    This object is deliberately thinner than Lansdown, Liddell and Weddell. Depth is the risk.

Graph

  • maitlandNEARDampier / Karratha port geography

Evidence

No evidence objects attached. Absence is not a low score.